Elara is a financial strategist with over a decade of experience in wealth management and entrepreneurship, dedicated to empowering others.
It's slightly embarrassing to reveal, but I'll say it. A handful of novels wait beside my bed, every one partially consumed. On my mobile device, I'm some distance through 36 audio novels, which seems small compared to the 46 digital books I've set aside on my digital device. This fails to account for the increasing stack of pre-release editions near my living room table, vying for blurbs, now that I work as a established novelist personally.
Initially, these stats might seem to confirm contemporary comments about current concentration. A writer observed a short while ago how easy it is to lose a individual's focus when it is fragmented by social media and the 24-hour news. They remarked: “Perhaps as readers' concentration evolve the writing will have to change with them.” But as a person who once would stubbornly finish every book I picked up, I now consider it a human right to set aside a book that I'm not in the mood for.
I do not believe that this habit is due to a brief attention span – rather more it relates to the feeling of time moving swiftly. I've often been struck by the Benedictine principle: “Keep death daily in view.” A different idea that we each have a mere finite period on this Earth was as shocking to me as to anyone else. However at what previous moment in human history have we ever had such direct availability to so many incredible masterpieces, anytime we want? A glut of options awaits me in each bookstore and within any screen, and I want to be intentional about where I direct my energy. Is it possible “not finishing” a book (term in the publishing industry for Incomplete) be not a mark of a limited focus, but a thoughtful one?
Especially at a period when the industry (and thus, selection) is still led by a particular demographic and its issues. While engaging with about people unlike ourselves can help to strengthen the muscle for empathy, we additionally choose books to think about our own lives and place in the world. Until the books on the shelves more fully depict the backgrounds, stories and issues of potential individuals, it might be quite hard to hold their focus.
Certainly, some writers are indeed skillfully crafting for the “contemporary attention span”: the concise writing of certain modern works, the focused fragments of others, and the short sections of several recent titles are all a excellent showcase for a shorter style and technique. Furthermore there is no shortage of author guidance aimed at securing a consumer: perfect that opening line, improve that beginning section, elevate the tension (more! more!) and, if crafting crime, introduce a victim on the beginning. This guidance is completely good – a prospective agent, publisher or audience will devote only a several precious moments determining whether or not to proceed. There's little reason in being contrary, like the writer on a class I participated in who, when questioned about the storyline of their manuscript, announced that “everything makes sense about three-fourths of the through the book”. Not a single novelist should subject their follower through a series of difficult tasks in order to be understood.
And I do write to be comprehended, as far as that is achievable. On occasion that demands guiding the consumer's hand, steering them through the story point by economical step. Sometimes, I've discovered, understanding demands time – and I must allow myself (as well as other authors) the grace of wandering, of adding depth, of digressing, until I find something authentic. A particular writer argues for the fiction discovering innovative patterns and that, rather than the traditional plot structure, “other structures might enable us envision novel ways to make our narratives alive and authentic, persist in creating our books original”.
In that sense, both viewpoints agree – the story may have to adapt to accommodate the today's reader, as it has repeatedly accomplished since it originated in the 1700s (in the form now). Maybe, like earlier novelists, coming creators will return to serialising their books in newspapers. The future such creators may already be sharing their work, chapter by chapter, on online services including those visited by countless of regular users. Art forms evolve with the era and we should allow them.
But we should not claim that every shifts are entirely because of limited focus. If that was so, brief fiction collections and flash fiction would be regarded considerably more {commercial|profitable|marketable
Elara is a financial strategist with over a decade of experience in wealth management and entrepreneurship, dedicated to empowering others.